翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport ・ R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport ・ R (film) ・ R (GC) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis ・ R (Green Environmental Industries Ltd) v Hertfordshire CC ・ R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport ・ R (Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd) v Central Arbitration Committee ・ R (L) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis ・ R (Los Angeles Railway) ・ R (National Union of Journalists) v Central Arbitration Committee ・ R (New York City Subway service) ・ R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice ・ R (on the application of SG and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ・ R (Playfoot) v Millais School Governing Body ・ R (programming language) ・ R (ProLife Alliance) v BBC ・ R (R. Kelly album) ・ R (Reilly) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ・ R (Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council ・ R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills ・ R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator ・ R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education and Employment ・ R . Ramakrishnan ・ R 510/900 ・ R A & T J Carll Ltd v Berry ・ R A Lister and Company ・ R A Streatfeild ・ R Adams ・ R Adams Cowley ・ R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R (ProLife Alliance) v BBC ： ウィキペディア英語版 R (ProLife Alliance) v BBC R (ProLife Alliance) v. BBC was a House of Lords case concerning the extent to which matters of good taste and decency are sufficient to justify the censorship of a Public Election Broadcast. The ProLife Alliance submitted a video that showed the results of an abortion. The video was held to violate statutory regulations requiring public broadcast to be decent. After extensive legal proceedings, the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the ProLife Alliance. However, the decision was overturned by the House of Lords. ==Facts== The ProLife Alliance is a political party that campaigns for "absolute respect for innocent human life from fertilisation until natural death and therefore opposes abortion, euthanasia, destructive embryo research and human cloning." (Paragraph 2 of the Court of Appeal judgment) In 1997, the ProLife Alliance had enough support to be granted a Public Election Broadcast (PEB), subject to rules set out by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), Independent Television Commission (ITC) and the Electoral Commission. The ProLife Alliance submitted a video that was graphic in nature. The video, the HL said, showed "the products of a suction abortion: tiny limbs, bloodied and dismembered, a separated head, their human shape and form plainly recognisable. There are some pictures showing the results of the procedures undertaken to procure an abortion at later stages... They are, I think, certainly disturbing to any person of ordinary sensibilities." The broadcasters declined to show the video, on the grounds that it could have been offensive or disturbing to a large number of viewers. The ProLife Alliance sought permission for judicial review of their decision, which was refused. "A further application to the Court of Appeal was also refused. The appellant applied to the European Court of Human Rights, alleging a violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). The application was declared inadmissible without the United Kingdom government being called on to put in observations." (Para. 7) 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R (ProLife Alliance) v BBC」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.